Has anybody asked Genming about them? Both of them are in his clan. I doubt he will put up with any BS.

That's for Requiem to find out, shakab113.

The evidence that you are a multi is quite strong:
You used both accounts to post in the same topic as the same person.
You gangbanged several players with both accounts.
And you have similar nicknames--small case letters followed by numbers.

what do you mean we gangbanged several players? i just met laxplaya in slow 1, the only game i have ever played that he was in...

btw, if you want me to turn against laxplaya in order to prove that we are both not multies, then that is no problem, he has more troops than i do, but i think i could hold my own...

Sorry guys about this. I did try to make an enquiry about it, BigAmigo. But nothing evidental that I can said yes or no here. This is the reply I got from laxplayer43
-----------------
Monday, September 22, 2003 - 14:16 Slow 1
lol... just out of curiousity... where u hear bout that? its actually a seperate person but i dont really log on nemore so i gave him my pw n told him he could finish the game we r in as me if he wanted :-P im gettin too busy with school and my new gf that i dont have time for even a 24 r game
----------------

laxplaya43 joined quite some time ago, shakab133 was a rather new account. Both don't post much but you would notice laxplaya43's post as not very grammatically readable compared to shakab133.

Ideally we could have Requiem check on the ip from the 2 accounts but till then I dun judge them guility yet.

Meantime I would request them to break up from attacking same player as well.

Uhm but still the message reads that one players moves both acounts to wage war against one person, even if they did so already before both acounts came under one person's control.

as long it was only for some days... no real problem.

I disagre totally with you Viva.

There needs to be clear and definite rules on this matter, there is no bending, twisting, or misunderstanding.

Multi is one player using more than one account. It does not gives temporal exceptions, nor nothing, it just that, you access two accounts, your a multi.

Multis should be deleted, all accounts, no arguing, no excuses.

If it was a mistake, or something, is a mistake or something that that player will not make again when he can get (if he can) another account.

I don't think it is too harsh to get read of cheats in the game.

This guy has total control over two armies, two players, in one game, and he directs them against the same enemies.

If this isn't an unfair advantage I don't know what is.

i no longer use laxplaya's acct, he will time out of the game. furthermore, if he ever does get back on, he will find a message asking him to change his password and not telling me, just so there is no possibility...i am also just going to quit the game that we were in (slow 1), since it has become an issue. i appologize for all this crap...um, not much else to say...

so geuritol your are saying that evern if a person may have 2 accounts or that he is loging on to an account for his brother or friend they both should be deleted?
(example)
Like my brother. He created an account way back when(before the change) and he no longer plays it now. But back then I would move for him when he couldn't get online and he would move for me when I couldn't get online. We weren't multi's, we where just helping the other out. But under your rule we would have both lost our accounts and had to start all over.(not that I would mind now, dam level won't budge)

Shakab133 is quitting his game. Laxplaya43 is not able to login these few days so it is likely he will be deemed inactive in his game soon too. Hopefully this will solve the problem.

Last Edited : Tuesday, 23 September 2003 - 23:04

Yes, this was discussed some time ago, and Req made his position very clear. It's breaking the rules, period.
A couple players admitted that they were guilty of doing this, it IS a clear advantage if the two players are involved in the same game...not to mention, fighting the same player. Doing so is not only being guilty of gangbanging but even worse, doing it as a multi. No excuse for this behavior....and certainly no pride or honor in defeating another player this way.

it IS a clear advantage if the two players are involved in the same game...

Now suppose that the multi's were not even in the same game or that one wasn't even playing games but instead forum posting?(now don't go looking at me, this is just a what if senario)

Wow.

It's nice to see someone actually own up to their mistake.

Your momma's proud of you for that, shakab.

Last Edited : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 - 01:20

dude shakab is probly not no multi but there is alot of ppl with seperate accounts even i have 1 but using them even in the same game is just wrong!

I don't have a separate account, nor think is good. Rules are rules, there are no exceptions. If there are exceptions then there is no rule.

I think shakab is an honorable player, and his attitude is very commendable, the fact that he admited that he was in an error is very ethical from his part.

It's been discussed before, an the same conclusion was derived: two accounts (whether you play the same game or not) that are accessed by the same person (for 1 time or more) is multi, and being a multi is punishable by deletion.

And no savetuba, I don't think what your said is bad, you talked about the past (long ago), so that means you're no longer doing it and as long as that is keep in the past (now that you know), I think its ok.

dude having 2 accounts is not cheating some ppl have lotsa spare time and want to play more than 3 games so they have a new account some ppl look after ppls accounts when they go on holidays n stuff the only way having a multi to cheat is using them in the same game!

><>

You are incorrect.

There is no arguing about what multi is. It has been spelt to use clearly by req (and everyone knows besides).

More than one account for a user is multi!!!.

Want more games, put out US $20.00 and presto, plus you get a nice golden globe, no biggie.

Yeah, so what you're saying is screw giving Req $20, just make two or three accounts, and if the game goes under, oh well...