| Back To Strategy & Tactics | Return To Forums |
| Forum : Strategy & Tactics | ||
|---|---|---|
| Author | Topic : Advantages and Disadvantages | |
| tackedlugnut Posts : 385 | Posted : Thursday, 29 January 2004 - 23:24 I realize this should have been put in the questions forum but it is about strategy so hopefully it wont be out of place here. | |
| the cat Posts : 404 | Posted : Thursday, 29 January 2004 - 23:46 At the start of a game, it's good to have large stacks of low-level troops. But in the mid/end game, it's more important to have master troops as low-level troops will be destroyed very quickly when they meet e.g. ballista and marks which outrange them. Basically it's all a balance - you need enough stacks to be able to impede your enemies movement, but enough high-level troops to be able to inflict damage from range on any type of enemy troop type. Remember that there is max damage in most games so usually there's not much point in creating troop stacks which can cause damage above their max damage. | |
| Fanatic Posts : 1148 | Posted : Friday, 30 January 2004 - 00:20 Assuming equal skill level and resources master level troops will ALWAYS beat expert level troops will always beat advanced troops will always beat basic troops. The higher production rates of the lower level troops don't come close to offsetting the greater power of the higher level troops. | |
Kyrion ![]() Posts : 633 | Posted : Friday, 30 January 2004 - 03:16 The only time (outside skirmish) when you want a stack to do more than their max damage is either with Macemen (where their unlimited retal atttacks that aren't capped can destroy stack after stack), or in a slow game where you plan to keep attacking at about 40% BP ( to get more attacks in). | |
Zander ![]() Posts : 332 | Posted : Friday, 30 January 2004 - 11:26 Not too mention fodder. Its annoying to have to kill basic troops when there are like 6 stacks of them, it also gives you a chance to possibly save/move your more advanced troops into a better attacking/defending/retreatin position. They arent completely useless | |
gueritol ![]() Posts : 2470 | Posted : Sunday, 1 February 2004 - 12:57 Now there are a few out there that prefer to go lower/middle level stacks in very high count, even at the end of the game...and they are doing quite well for themselves... | |
Kyrion ![]() Posts : 633 | Posted : Sunday, 1 February 2004 - 15:20 If you are going to take large stacks of low level troops make sure: | |
gueritol ![]() Posts : 2470 | Posted : Monday, 2 February 2004 - 10:34 Ping!. | |
| VivaChe Posts : 1041 | Posted : Monday, 2 February 2004 - 14:32 imo it all depend on the ressources you have. | |
Kagemusha ![]() Posts : 89 | Posted : Monday, 2 February 2004 - 21:22 Also of value is that most master level troops have special abilites which mean they are far better than their basic counterparts. | |
| Crovax Posts : 595 | Posted : Wednesday, 4 February 2004 - 01:45 I hate it that people still my comm strategy... grr | |
Genming ![]() Posts : 869 | Posted : Thursday, 5 February 2004 - 09:41 Ya ya go ahead and use those big stack low level troops. My ballistas love them. | |
gueritol ![]() Posts : 2470 | Posted : Thursday, 5 February 2004 - 11:24 Also High level HC and Maces love those!. | |
CTDXXX ![]() Posts : 5519 | Posted : Friday, 6 February 2004 - 00:10 Pity they normally come a little late on to REALLY build, and the extra cost for levels involves multiplying the extra cost for the initial skill superiority | |
| Silva Husky Posts : 1458 | Posted : Friday, 6 February 2004 - 05:40 Ballistas are pretty useless unless you got the right size stacks....too big = redundancy, too small = not enough bonus....heheh | |
| Back To Strategy & Tactics | Return To Forums |