I figured clan rankings should be done like the Overall Champions list, by adding up both ranks (ie: boe is 4th and 1st, giving him a total of 5. 2nd place is far below him with 17)

(If there was a tie, I gave the higher rank to the most well rounded clan, as I don't know how a tie works on the champion tables...it hurt my clan in the rankings, so just trust me that I have no agenda here. )

So here, with no further delay, are our WoL clan rankings!

Top Campaign Clans:

1. BOS - 69
2. FSA - 68
3. IJA - 67
4. AAA - 64
5. (K) - 49
6. +=> - 49
7. CoC - 47
8. > - 47
9. 3k - 45
10.BoP- 43

Top Battle Clans:

1. CoC - 102
2. BoS - 91
3. KoW - 64
4. IJA - 53
5. AAA - 45
6. +=> - 43
7. FSA - 32
8. (K) - 31
9. WAR - 25
10. CIA - 24

The top OVERALL clans:

1. BoS (1st and 2nd, that gives them a 3)
2. IJA (2nd and 4th...6)
3. CoC (7th and 1st....8)
4. AAA (4rd and 5th....9)
5. FSA (2nd and 7th...9)
6. +=> (6th and 6th...12)
7. (K) (5th and 8th...13)
8. KOW (14th and 3rd..17)
9. > (8th and 12th..20)
10.CIA (12th and 10th..22)

Updated as of 4:39, September 4th

Last Edited : Saturday, 4 September 2004 - 16:40

we beat the CoC!!


Kyrion

We're tied, you're just more well rounded

You may want to check LtPains rankngs. Not sure all is right in the ranks if BoS defeats IJA and is still behind them on your list.

The clan games only cover one aspect of the game, campaigns. These tables are done in the same manner as the OFFICIAL scoreboards...

The numbers I use are the clan average. Whether or not the levels show the true skill is up for question, but the level system is how we run things around here. For example, I beat Overlord in our last skirmish game together, and I'm beating him again this game. He's higher level than me. He gets a higher spot on the rankings table than I do. Its just how things work.

Last Edited : Tuesday, 22 June 2004 - 20:47

FSA is tied with WARLORDS for battles?!?!?!?
This is not acceptable....

TL

actually, TL, you're 1/3 of a point above them.

That 1/3 of a point is all that is keeping you guys from falling to 5th or 6th place! (How would we decide between FSA and CoC? Crusaders are more well rounded than both of us, but if you lost that 1/3 of a point it'd be 1st in campaigns and 9th in battles versus 9th in campaigns and 1st in battles.

Meh, it'd probably go to you guys cause you have more members.

Sage i am glad you reasoned this out sensibly with yourself

Sage,

What ypu're measuring is the clan's strength, not their ranking. The ranking can only be found in the clan's performance in clan games. Somewhere in here Fanatic has a clan ladder ranking.

Alright, I'll rename this then.

We already have the champions list for individual players.

I dub this the CLAN CHAMPIONS LIST.

And until they come out with clan battles, I refuse to recognize clan games as the one and only way to judge clans. Campaigns are only half the game.

Plus, clan games only tell you which clan has the strongest 5 strongest players. If you only put your 5 strongest players forward in a clan game, you're not representing the whole clan.

Last Edited : Wednesday, 23 June 2004 - 18:56

Updated. I'll update whenever (A. I think to do it or (B. Whenever someone asks me.

Last Edited : Wednesday, 23 June 2004 - 18:12

can you update it now?

Alright, I updated it. None of the ranks changed, although KOW did lose a few points and CIA gained one.

From now on, only ask me to update it if (A. I haven't updated in a while or (B. Something has changed. IE: FSA loses 4 battle points, therefore falling behind WAR on the battle charts and falling to 6th place on the overall charts. Your spot is fragile, FSA, fragile indeed

Not that you care about anything but the campaign chart, of course

can you update it now?

Well, I should update it now that boevoipes is in CoC, but part of me still doesn't believe that he's here to stay. It'd be too much work to switch back if he for some reason changes his mind tomorrow.

can you update it now?

since, ahemm....

You know.!!

Alright, BA, I'll change FSA's score from 27.33 to 28. Woo.

And what exactly happened to move us up?

Do you recall?

haha...i know, i know

Um...you beat me with a mass marks strat?

Mass marks strats aren't exactly the pinnacle of strategy, BA. You had ranged AND rps advantage, I outplayed you and I still lost.

Come on, if you're going to go with mass marks, at least PROTECT the little guys. A 2 pop squire and a 1 pop falc does not a defense make.

But, despite the crushing odds, you DID in fact prove to me that you were skilled enough to beat me at 12:30 in the morning with ranged and rps advantage.

I'd like to see you beat me again Maybe this time with a more legitimate strat.