I take it that in a campaign game in which two clans are going against each other, there are no "unethical attacks". In other words "gang banging" is part of the strategy and two or more members of clan A can attack one member of clan B and so on. Is this correct? Are there ANY "ethical" issues in clan games?

theres is to be no gang banging in (campaign games=as in a regular game) even if its 2 clan member against the other 1 player with 1 castle cause its just not right there should be no clan fighting in those games thats why there is clan games u go there then in a clan game u have 5 people to go against 5 people and there u can have 3 on 1 or 5 on 1 and theres nothing wrong with that...

GW: do you mean clan games, or campaign games?
In clan games verything except bug abuse is allowed. In campaign games gangbanging is frowned upon.

I guess Raptor is trying to say the same thing as Eg did only a bit less clearly. Never mind Raptor, you'll get the hang of posting soon enough

Eg, is correct. There is however one exception. If the victim is Sage, then Gangbanging is also allowed in regular campaign games!

well i my self don't like gangbanging but but sometimes u have to do it. n 1 of my games a friend and another player ask me if i was going to help the other n need. i told him about my nap, he said ok and started helping the fellow player n need(it was 3 on 1), but i had a nap with 1 of them and i couldn't help him rite away. but after ur nap was up. i attacked him, took his castle and started attacking the others. now it a 3 on 2 match now. me a 2 others attacking remaining 2 who was attacking the 1st guy n need of help.


thats one way i think gangbanging is needed n a campain game.

Thanks, between all of you I have gleaned the truth and it has set me free...