i dont no about you but i think that we should introduce new armies for the advanced players like futuristic ones we could still keep the old ones but have new ones aswell like tanks instead of archers etc

yes or no

no, then it should hve other name also

Last Edited : Thursday, 25 November 2004 - 19:38

I suggest that Req concetrates his work on the already planned armies first.

ok just a thought

I remember a suggestion about WW2 scenarios, and Req wasn't against it. But he wanted to finish what he started first.

ok thanks for the info just wanted to no

just out of interest what has he started?

Well, he has some changes to the system planned, and a bunch of new classes. Fantasy, Undead and Barbarian are listed in the Online Manual, and Demonic has only made it to Battle Games yet.

If modern or futuristic armies do appear, they won't make much sense versus any other armies for the sake of balance. I mean, how much damage do you expect marksmen to do to tanks?

Swiss Pikemen VS A7V Tanks!!!!

Now that would be interesting! tanks wouldnt be rock they would be a whole mountain!

Yeah but a "stug" against a "tank" would
"rock n' roll"

TR

Last Edited : Tuesday, 26 April 2005 - 23:06

Imagine a STuG vs an A7V... A machine gun could penetrate the German wwI A7V... A STuG hit would smoke it good...

Maybe even a STuH42 which is the howitzer instead of the AT gun... LOL. STuH42 VS Heavy Cavalry might give me a fighting chance! al long s I had the STuH42 and not the Hvy Cav

wouldn't......No I won't comment.....

i wasnt suggesting that we put tanks etc against marskmen i meant put tanks against tanks, machine guns, foot soliders, cannons etc just for higher level players so the balance was right and so the lower level players had an insentive to play and get better