Back To Question Corner   |   Return To Forums
Forum : Question Corner
AuthorTopic : To players fighting a stringer opponent (closed)
TCWeb
Joined 13/02/2003
Posts : 15

Posted : Sunday, 20 February 2005 - 06:01

I have recently played a game were a player managed to scavange an empty castle and its resources very early in a game. They proposed a NAP but this would let them build on this advantage and completly wipe my out when the NAP ended so I decided to fight them before the advantage became too much. Coming up to turn 40ish I am definatly losing. They have far more advanced troops than me. I ask for help. I have tried to fight these two castles on my own, but they are two strong now. I find a willing ally, but the opponent cries gangbang and scares of my ally.
I believe a team with two castles from the beggining should not expect to fight one on one through out the game. They have an unfair advantage. An attack by two players early on would be unfair but by turn 40 out of 100 it is just. Just as if there is a dominate player then weeker teams can fight togther to make a fair battle. 2 castles against 2 catles, 3 castles against 3 castles.
What do people think. Is this Gangbang or Fair?

Back To Question Corner   |   Return To Forums