| Back To Strategy & Tactics | Return To Forums |
| Forum : Strategy & Tactics | ||
|---|---|---|
| Author | Topic : Combined or Combined | |
| Dreadme Posts : 18 | Posted : Saturday, 16 April 2005 - 22:31 I was wondering what you guys think is better, say you have 2 armies of 50, is it more sensible to attack with these armies seperate or to combine them and then attack. I am going with both of them having the same stats and facing an ennemie of between 40-60. | |
Ghengis Khan ![]() Posts : 828 | Posted : Saturday, 16 April 2005 - 22:39 If you are facing one unit it is better to keep them seperate. You can then trap that unit to prevent it from running and let your two units take turns with the first attack each turn. It helps to keep both units stronger. | |
Luger ![]() Posts : 171 | Posted : Monday, 18 April 2005 - 23:58 I think there are only two times it would be bad to do the two attacks with 50 armies instead of one attack with 100 armies. Either: | |
| CREST Posts : 322 | Posted : Tuesday, 19 April 2005 - 00:07 well there is a bounus for larger armys if your doing over 1k dmg you limit the damaged you take in retaliation to your stack also if you keep using that stack it becomes a super stack because of its high lvl i myselfe perfer bigger stacks mixed whith some mid sized stacks | |
| Finguld Posts : 272 | Posted : Wednesday, 11 May 2005 - 08:15 I usually like some shock troops. They are usually a big stack that hits first and does the most damage and limits retal. Then small stack can hit with no retal. Also if you stagger your attack hours you can keep attacking with no retal. Now about 100 being better than 50 50 that depends on the game and troop type. Like 1 100 ballista is better than 2 50s. A 100 stack of HC though maybe to much unless it is a skrimish game. | |
| Back To Strategy & Tactics | Return To Forums |